Let’s take a few of the migrants’ home countries: Oh no, they’re coming from some of the most beautiful, tropical, resource-heavy nations on the globe. It’s not as if they’re coming from places where it’s pitch-black in December and the average temperature is freezing - like Finland. Why is it a good idea to bring in people with a track record of creating economic catastrophes?

In dinosaur times, for example, there was no “economy” because there were no humans. The Times acts as if “the economy” is some sort of supernatural force raining down on hapless innocents, perhaps brought on by witchcraft - or maybe Martian death rays! No, an economy is created by people. Thus, The New York Times tells us: “Many migrants are coming from places like Venezuela, which was suffering one of the worst economic crises in the world before the pandemic.” Liberals expect us to be moved by the horrible conditions they’re fleeing. (Again, “country,” not “battered women’s shelter.”) Which is why most Americans think the ideal number of immigrants is about zero.īut the media act as if every desperate, poverty-stricken foreigner has a God-given right to come here. “Why are Americans’ lives getting shorter?” - The Economist economy is in its fourth decade of rising inequality” - Equitable Growth “Why are Americans getting dumber?” - UnHerd

“What Americans’ declining height has to say about the economy” - PBS We have a right to decide who moves here, becomes our fellow citizen and shapes the kind of country we are.Īnd we’re getting a little sick of reading headlines like these: We keep hearing about needing an “orderly process” to get the migrants into our country, “building lawful pathways,” and helping the migrants bypass coyotes.ġ) They have no right to come to our country andĪmid the hectoring from the mainstream media, it can be hard to remember, but we are a country, not a battered women’s shelter. There seems to be a fundamental misunderstanding at the heart our current immigration debate.

Robert langdon deception point